New materials regarding research in the fields of architecture and urban construction are being presented. The authors also focus on the history of the creation of little-known buildings of interest, on the development of local architectural traditions, on new attributions, and introduce recently discovered archive materials. A number of papers are dedicated to the issues of architectural and urban planning development of historical towns and cities or study the formation of architectural ensembles. The edition also includes papers that are devoted to theoretical historical-architectural problems, to biographies of architects, or analyze artistic approaches and concepts.
Issue 62 (2015)
Boris Kirikov.
The Church of Notre Dame de France in St. Petersburg. From the Neo-Romanesque Style to Northern Art Nouveau
The paper studies the history of the creation and the style of the French Catholic Church in St. Petersburg (1903–1909). Its initial project was worked out by L. N. Benois, who had been inspired by the Romanesque architecture of Southern France. As the construction went on, and M. M. Peretiatkovich took part in it as an equal partner, the original design was changed. In the end the Neo-Romanesque features of the building were radically transformed, owing to the influence of northern Art Nouveau.
Keywords
L. N. Benois, M. M. Peretiatkovich, Neo-Romanesque architecture, northern Art Nouveau, French diaspora in St. Petersburg.
Kirikov, Boris M.
Ph. D. in Art Studies, counselor of the Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences, Scientific Research Institute of the Theory and History of Architecture and Urban Planning, branch of the Federal State Budget Institution “Central Scientific-Research and Project Institute of the Construction Ministry of Russia”, leading research fellow.
E-mail: niitag@yandex.ru
References
1. Rossiiskii Gosudarstvennyi Istoricheskii arkhiv (RGIA), File No 826, List No 1, Rule No 839.
2. Rossiiskii Gosudarstvennyi Istoricheskii arkhiv (RGIA), File No 1293, List No 170, Rule No 67.
3. Tsentral’nyi gosudarstvennyi istoricheskii arkhiv Sankt-Peterburga (TsGIA SPb), File No 513, List No 102, Rule No 4161, Page No 10–37.
4. Tsentral’nyi gosudarstvennyi istoricheskii arkhiv Sankt-Peterburga (TsGIA SPb), File No 569, List No 15, Rule No 735.
5. Antonov V. V., Kobak A. V. Sviatyni Sankt-Peterburga. Khristianskaia istoriko-tserkovnaia entsiklopediia. Saint-Petersburg, 2003.
6. Benua L. N. Zapiski o moei deiatel’nosti. Nevskii arkhiv. Istoriko-kraevedcheskii sbornik, Moscow ; Saint-Petersburg, 1993.
7. Boglachev S. V., Kikhel’ A. S. Akademik arkhitektury Marian Peretiatkovich (1872–1916). Arkhitektura: master, klass, epokha. Materialy IV akademicheskikh chtenii Iuzhnogo regional’nogo otdeleniia RAASN, Rostov-on-Don, 2005.
8. Ezhegodnik Moskovskogo arkhitekturnogo obshchestva, i. 1. Moscow, 1909.
9. Ezhegodnik Obshchestva arkhitektorov-khudozhnikov, i. 5. Saint-Petersburg, 1910.
10. Zodchii, 1902, p. 59.
11. Zodchii, 1903, no 28.
12. Zodchii, 1903, no 24.
13. Zodchii, 1908, pp. 17–19.
14. Zodchii, 1911, no 11.
15. Kirikov B. M. Arkhitektura peterburgskikh khramov perioda moderna. Kraevedcheskie zapiski. Issledovaniia i materialy, i. 8, Saint-Petersburg, 2001, pp. 47–51.
16. Kirikov B. M. Arkhitektura peterburgskogo moderna. Osobniaki i dokhodnye doma. Saint-Petersburg, 2014.
17. Kirikov B. M. M. M. Peretiatkovich, I. I. Rerberg i F. O. Shekhtel’. K voprosu o tvorcheskikh vzaimosviaziakh v arkhitekture nachala XX v. F. O. Shekhtel’ i problemy istorii russkoi arkhitektury kontsa XIX — nachala XX vekov, Moscow, 1988, pp. 95–103.
18. Kirikov B. M. Proobraz i interpretatsiia. Ob odnom pamiatnike kul’tovoi arkhitektury perioda moderna Peterburgskie chteniia — 96, Saint-Petersburg, 1996, pp. 169–171.
19. Kirikov B. M., Shtiglits M. S. Arkhitektura leningradskogo avangarda. Putevoditel’. Saint-Petersburg, 2008; 2012.
20. Krasovskii Mikh. 1911. Koe-chto o sovremennykh tserkvakh Frantsii. Zodchii, no 2, pp. 14–18.
21. Lukomskii G. 1910. Novosti arkhitekturnoi zhizni. Zodchii, no 6, pp. 55–57.
22. Nedelia stroitelia, 1899, no 21.
23. Stroitel’, 1903, no 13–18.